Tyler Hopper wrote:
> "Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Tyler Hopper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Poultry doesn't benefit from low n slow so just set up your rig to run the
>
> same
>
>>>as your oven.
>>>
>>
>>I do have to counter this propaganda. A slow cooked bird (5#, 5hr 250)
>>is a different product than a roasted bird (5#, 1.5hr 350) but it is an
>>_excellent_ product none the less. I do them that way all the time to
>>rave reviews. Checkout "Best chicken in the history of chicken" in a.b.f
>>under the 2smokers2 subject line.
>
>
> Okay, let me modify my statement. You don't need to cook poultry low n slow to
> try to tenderize it like you do a butt or brisket.

I have to agree, though low and slow chicken is much more tender than
roasted. They both have their place.

Matthew

--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game