|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
|
Standing Rib Roast: bone in or boneless?
Roy wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 9:40:32 AM UTC-7, Abiquiu wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>> On 15/12/2015 22:24 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:03:09 -0600, Sqwertz >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:08:41 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, they are indeed different. In both cases, the flavour is enhanced
>>>>>> by the presence of the bone.
>>>>>
>>>>> The rib meat between the bones tastes better because of the extra fat
>>>>> and cartilage. But the idea that it makes of the rest of the roast
>>>>> taste better is just false.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> I think people who eat all this highly spiced Mexican food numb their
>>>> taste buds to some degree. Or at least overwork them.
>>>
>>> A white woman's prejudice.
>>>
>>
>> Typical canuck bigot, yes...
>
> What do you mean by "typical"? Do think all Canucks are bigots?
Ever read the posts from "a moose in love"?
Shoot, just audit can.politics for a spell.
Maybe it's just canucks with a 'puter and usenet inclinations.
> Typical of YOU to think so, you asshole.
<vbg>
> Gawd, I'm sick of your frickin' censorship attempts and harassing of
> posters to this forum.
Blah blah blah...
> Get lost.
> =====
No.
|