On 25 Aug 2004 12:54:22 GMT, Michel Boucher >
wrote:

(Curly Sue) wrote in
:
>
>> Generally I don't read what you write unless it's about food, but
>> I haven't taken a vow not to do so.
>
>So there's no way I can tell if you're going to butt in, is there...
>
>> On a personal note Michel,
>> you have to accept the fact that when you post here anyone can
>> comment on it, just as you feel free to comment on the posts of
>> others. That seems fair, doesn't it?
>
>It's fair if you're being fair, and actually, you're not. Fair is
>supporting my side, asking people to be more explicit in their
>postings when it comes to their constituency...which is all I did.
>You would be on my case faster than a cat on fish if I dared to post
>something applying only to Canadians without ever saying it only
>applied to Canadians, or mentioning Canada even once. You would call
>THAT rude, and you would be right to do that.

You wish I would. However, I notice that you haven't even though
there is a very nice example in this subject.

>I was not inclined that day to adhere to the strict Curly Sue code of
>goodness and niceness, although I was neither rude nor insulting.
>Are *you* always nice? No, as your many posts to me have
>demonstrated, so learn to live with it.

>Still waiting for Patrick NY ) to pipe up. So
>far, he's nowhere to be found.

Whatever floats your boat.

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!