On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:32:11 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
> wrote in message
.. .
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:04:03 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
> wrote in message
>>>news >>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:22:31 -0500, jmcquown >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 1/6/2016 8:34 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>>>>> All my money is happy money! I can't remember the last time I went
>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>> >without Himself and he carries money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OMG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Janet UK
>>>>>
>>>>>I sure hope "Himself" doesn't die before she does. Whatever would she
>>>>>do?!
>>>>>
>>>>>Jill
>>>>
>>>> Huh? I don't get what you mean, what difference would it make,
>>>> imagine they have a joint account as did we.
>>>
>>>??? Everything we have is joint! All our pensions, savings et al!
>>>
>>>I wonder if she has a joint account with her 'SO' ... and what difference
>>>it
>>>would make if 'SO' dies before she does.
>>>
>>>If not, whatever would she do?!
>>>
>>>And No, I don't care!
>>
>> Well if she had, she wouldn't have wondered how you would manage. When
>> David died nothing changed for me other than that I no longer had him
>> No worries as to money etc. Three little words 'All to wife' -
>
>Of course! Or partner and children?

I suppose partner would open the will to contest by blood relatives
and while child might work, children might produce difficulties.

According to lawyers, all to wife is the strongest will that can be
made and really cannot be fought unless you want to pay lawyers and
lose