On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:56:34 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote:

>jmcquown wrote:
>> On 1/6/2016 2:33 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2016 15:06 tert in seattle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:48:14 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> potatoes, carrots, leeks, water, salt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm hoping it's good - we'll see
>>>>>
>>>>> It'll be weak. Needs a chicken.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> nope! all it needed was a bit of cream, just like the recipe says
>>>>
>>>> try it and you'll see
>>>
>>> You're talking to meat eaters. If it doesn't contain a bit of
>>> corpse, it's not food.
>>>
>> Oh puleeze. My question is were the vegetables at least sauteed before
>> simply being dumped in a pot of water with salt?
>>
>> Now we find it's finished off with a bit of cream. I still have not
>> seen a link to the recipe. Um... but still no seasonings?
>>
>> Do vegetarians have an objection to pepper? Herbs or other spices? I
>> don't care about using chicken. As posted it sounds like an incredibly
>> boring soup.
>>
>> Jill
>
>there's a bit more to the recipe, like mash the vegetables with a fork
>once they've softened up, and "correct the seasoning", and top it off
>with some parsely or chives
>
>but the soup is very good with potatoes, carrots, leeks, water, salt,
>and then the cream added just before serving
>
>I was skeptical myself but now I am a believer
>
>if I feel motivated I will scan the recipe and email it to you but you
>have to promise not to report me for copyright violation

You'll be fine if you acknowledge whose recipe and from what book.