FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Janet

In article >,
says...
>
> > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:32:11 -0000, "Ophelia" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:04:03 -0000, "Ophelia" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> > wrote in message
> >>>>news > >>>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:22:31 -0500, jmcquown >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On 1/6/2016 8:34 AM, Janet wrote:
> >>>>>>>> All my money is happy money! I can't remember the last time I went
> >>>>>>>> out
> >>>>>>>> >without Himself and he carries money.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OMG
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Janet UK
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I sure hope "Himself" doesn't die before she does. Whatever would she
> >>>>>>do?!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Jill
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Huh? I don't get what you mean, what difference would it make,
> >>>>> imagine they have a joint account as did we.
> >>>>
> >>>>??? Everything we have is joint! All our pensions, savings et al!
> >>>>
> >>>>I wonder if she has a joint account with her 'SO' ... and what
> >>>>difference
> >>>>it
> >>>>would make if 'SO' dies before she does.
> >>>>
> >>>>If not, whatever would she do?!
> >>>>
> >>>>And No, I don't care!
> >>>
> >>> Well if she had, she wouldn't have wondered how you would manage. When
> >>> David died nothing changed for me other than that I no longer had him
> >>> No worries as to money etc. Three little words 'All to wife' -
> >>
> >>Of course! Or partner and children?

> > I suppose partner would open the will to contest by blood relatives
> > and while child might work, children might produce difficulties.
> >
> > According to lawyers, all to wife is the strongest will that can be
> > made and really cannot be fought unless you want to pay lawyers and
> > lose
>
> Of course!

That simply isnt true in Scotland.

Janet UK