soup
jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/6/2016 3:56 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2016 2:33 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2016 15:06 tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:48:14 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> potatoes, carrots, leeks, water, salt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm hoping it's good - we'll see
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It'll be weak. Needs a chicken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>> nope! all it needed was a bit of cream, just like the recipe says
>>>>>
>>>>> try it and you'll see
>>>>
>>>> You're talking to meat eaters. If it doesn't contain a bit of
>>>> corpse, it's not food.
>>>>
>>> Oh puleeze. My question is were the vegetables at least sauteed before
>>> simply being dumped in a pot of water with salt?
>>>
>>> Now we find it's finished off with a bit of cream. I still have not
>>> seen a link to the recipe. Um... but still no seasonings?
>>>
>>> Do vegetarians have an objection to pepper? Herbs or other spices? I
>>> don't care about using chicken. As posted it sounds like an incredibly
>>> boring soup.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> there's a bit more to the recipe, like mash the vegetables with a fork
>> once they've softened up, and "correct the seasoning", and top it off
>> with some parsely or chives
>>
>> but the soup is very good with potatoes, carrots, leeks, water, salt,
>> and then the cream added just before serving
>>
>> I was skeptical myself but now I am a believer
>>
>> if I feel motivated I will scan the recipe and email it to you but you
>> have to promise not to report me for copyright violation
>>
> LOL I promise!
>
> Jill
okay - check your inbox
|