tert in seattle wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:15:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:13:08 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 00:34:13 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> reversing evolution. Our bodies (and digestive systems) have evolved
>>>>>>>>>> greatly since Paleolithic times so it certainly doesn't make sense
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know about other stuff, but if you want to get scientific, the
>>>>>>>>> human digestive system clearly puts us in the frugivore category, just
>>>>>>>>> the same as most other primates
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there is a theory that our brains became larger as a result of cooking
>>>>>>>>> food and greater availability of glucose (less work chewing, more work
>>>>>>>>> thinking)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but our teeth haven't changed much and neither have our innards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you're wrong on both counts. Our digestive system, starting in
>>>>>>>> the mouth changed significantly once we started cooking food. We are
>>>>>>>> clearly not frugivores. You've been reading too many raw/vegetarian
>>>>>>>> kook sites.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I posted this before -- here's yer kook website
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "In other words, there is very little evidence that our guts are terribly
>>>>>>> special and the job of a generalist primate gut is primarily to eat
>>>>>>> pieces of plants."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/human-ancestors-were-nearly-all-vegetarians/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He does come right out and say that our digestive system *did* evolve
>>>>>>> with agriculture and processing (fermenting and cooking) of food, but
>>>>>>> not anatomically -- which is what I meant by teeth and innards -- but
>>>>>>> physiologically, with upregulation of amylase and persistence of lactase
>>>>>>> into adulthood.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The human digestive became *physically* shorter with the introduction
>>>>>> of cooked meat and plants that were easier to digest. Our jaws and
>>>>>> teeth became smaller and weaker because food became softer.
>>>>>
>>>>> you mean "humanoid" digestive ...tract?
>>>>
>>>> The digestive SYSTEM of humans.
>>>
>>> well, the digestive system of humans doesn't have a length, really, but
>>> the tract does
>>
>> The tract is part of the digestive system. I said SYSTEM because it
>> encompasses the teeth and jaw as well, as that was what we were also
>> talking about.
>>
>>> and the digestive tract of humans (homo sapiens sapiens) hasn't changed
>>> at all
>>
>> "Human" includes all the homos, including you and Gregory. We were
>> NEVER referring just to Modern Humans.
>>
>> I guess all this attempted nitpicking means you have no other logical
>> arguments.
>>
>>> It helps to see that the Smithsonian is comfortable referring to species
>>> from 6 million years ago as "human". If you want to stick with the 4th
>>> grade version of science, I'm not going to argue.
>>
>> Exactly how I've been using the word. So now that you've been proven
>> wrong, you have to criticize them, too? What is the extent of your
>> degree in anthropology, BTW?
>>
>> -sw
>
> I haven't been proven wrong. You have shown that you like to "win"
> arguments. Congratulations.
>

**** that woman stalker straight to everlasting HELL!

Tear it's ****ing lips off its bloody fat face!