On 10/01/2016 11:31 AM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:07:30 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 05:08:04 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I could generalize that Walmart favors the less impoverished parts
>>>> of towns and cities, where people have more disposable income.
>>>
>>> They go into the worst areas where I live. Nobody in affluent areas
>>> wants a nearby Walmart devaluing property and the less affluent areas
>>> need their paltry paying jobs.
>>>
>> Iow, they DO create jobs where they're needed.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> That's the idea around here.
>>
>> Btw - "paltry" was just raised by them to $10/hr.
>>
>> Just so you know...
>
> Still just a drop in the bucket. $15 an hour doesn't go very far
> here.
>
F.W. Woolworth said that if there were the choice that you could screw
the rich or screw the poor, then screw the poor because there are more
of them.
That seems to be part of their philosophy.