On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:11:39 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:33:05 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >
> >> Cheri wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "sf" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:07:30 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> sf wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 05:08:04 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I could generalize that Walmart favors the less impoverished parts
> >>>>>>> of towns and cities, where people have more disposable income.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They go into the worst areas where I live. Nobody in affluent areas
> >>>>>> wants a nearby Walmart devaluing property and the less affluent areas
> >>>>>> need their paltry paying jobs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Iow, they DO create jobs where they're needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's the idea around here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Btw - "paltry" was just raised by them to $10/hr.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just so you know...
> >>>>
> >>>> Still just a drop in the bucket. $15 an hour doesn't go very far
> >>>> here.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> sf
> >>>
> >>> Probably should find a different *here* to live.
> >>>
> >>> Cheri
> >>
> >> Yabut...she lives in a mucho cool city.
> >
> > Thanks. I'm not part of the working poor, but it doesn't mean I'm
> > blind or unsympathetic.
> >
> Of course not, a problem doesn't go away from ignoring it.
>
> Oh for that to be true...
>
> Goodbye meth!

We have more pressing problems to deal with than a few people using
illegal drugs.

--

sf