On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:10:56 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:31:30 -0800, "Cheri" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "sf" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:07:30 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> sf wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 05:08:04 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I could generalize that Walmart favors the less impoverished parts
> >>>>>> of towns and cities, where people have more disposable income.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They go into the worst areas where I live. Nobody in affluent areas
> >>>>> wants a nearby Walmart devaluing property and the less affluent areas
> >>>>> need their paltry paying jobs.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Iow, they DO create jobs where they're needed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> That's the idea around here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Btw - "paltry" was just raised by them to $10/hr.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just so you know...
> >>>
> >>> Still just a drop in the bucket. $15 an hour doesn't go very far
> >>> here.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> sf
> >>
> >> Probably should find a different *here* to live.
> >>
> > They are. Poverty is being suburbanized.
> >
>
> And re-funded by complicit politicians.

Do you have any idea what apartments rent for in SF? Look it up.
People who barely make it here can live very nicely elsewhere.

--

sf