On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:09:20 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 2/2/2016 12:55 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:37:48 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/2/2016 6:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You have reading comprehension problems. Look above. I said that I
>>>> haven't actually used the canned yet.
>>>
>>> Mea Culpa. You did say that. Still, canned wild rice... eeeks!
>>
>> You have to read it really carefully, often 2 or 3 times because she
>> see-saws back and forth between points a lot. Usually (or always)
>> it's just not worth it.
>>
>> At least she didn't call you a bitch this time. You bitch!
>>
>> -sw
>>
>*******o! Ask me if I care what she calls me. She writes such long
>discourses it is difficult to figure out the point. It's sometimes
>amusing to try to discern it.
>
>I focused on the canned wild rice because I'd never heard of it. I've
>cooked a lot of wild rice in my lifetime. Casseroles, soups. None of
>the wild rice came out of a can.
>
>The mind boggles!
>
>It's just another one of those situations where she bought a case of
>something she never tried. She has no idea whether or not she'll like
>it. Any guesses? LOL
>
>She already stated her husband and daughter won't eat wild rice.
>
>I can't wait for the next installment of 'The Canned Wild Rice' saga.

Why are you showing your real face lately? It's not a pretty sight,
you know.

--
Bruce