On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 6:28:50 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:09:20 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 2/2/2016 12:55 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:37:48 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2/2/2016 6:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> You have reading comprehension problems. Look above. I said that I
> >>>> haven't actually used the canned yet.
> >>>
> >>> Mea Culpa. You did say that. Still, canned wild rice... eeeks!
> >>
> >> You have to read it really carefully, often 2 or 3 times because she
> >> see-saws back and forth between points a lot. Usually (or always)
> >> it's just not worth it.
> >>
> >> At least she didn't call you a bitch this time. You bitch!
> >>
> >> -sw
> >>
> >*******o! Ask me if I care what she calls me. She writes such long
> >discourses it is difficult to figure out the point. It's sometimes
> >amusing to try to discern it.
> >
> >I focused on the canned wild rice because I'd never heard of it. I've
> >cooked a lot of wild rice in my lifetime. Casseroles, soups. None of
> >the wild rice came out of a can.
> >
> >The mind boggles!
> >
> >It's just another one of those situations where she bought a case of
> >something she never tried. She has no idea whether or not she'll like
> >it. Any guesses? LOL
> >
> >She already stated her husband and daughter won't eat wild rice.
> >
> >I can't wait for the next installment of 'The Canned Wild Rice' saga.
>
> Why are you showing your real face lately? It's not a pretty sight,
> you know.
>
> --
> Bruce

Stay out of the fray my friend or you will wish you had. We know you like to troll but this is not the time or the place.
=====