"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:09:20 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>>On 2/2/2016 12:55 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:37:48 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/2/2016 6:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You have reading comprehension problems. Look above. I said that I
>>>>> haven't actually used the canned yet.
>>>>
>>>> Mea Culpa. You did say that. Still, canned wild rice... eeeks!
>>>
>>> You have to read it really carefully, often 2 or 3 times because she
>>> see-saws back and forth between points a lot. Usually (or always)
>>> it's just not worth it.
>>>
>>> At least she didn't call you a bitch this time. You bitch!
>>>
>>> -sw
>>>
>>*******o! Ask me if I care what she calls me. She writes such long
>>discourses it is difficult to figure out the point. It's sometimes
>>amusing to try to discern it.
>>
>>I focused on the canned wild rice because I'd never heard of it. I've
>>cooked a lot of wild rice in my lifetime. Casseroles, soups. None of
>>the wild rice came out of a can.
>>
>>The mind boggles!
>>
>>It's just another one of those situations where she bought a case of
>>something she never tried. She has no idea whether or not she'll like
>>it. Any guesses? LOL
>>
>>She already stated her husband and daughter won't eat wild rice.
>>
>>I can't wait for the next installment of 'The Canned Wild Rice' saga.
>
> Why are you showing your real face lately? It's not a pretty sight,
> you know.

She is lonely and takes out all her frustrations here.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/