On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:36:30 -0400, jmcquown >
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
>>> > In article >, says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>> >>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>> >>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>> >>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>> >>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>> >>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>> >>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>> >>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>> >>>
>>> >> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>>> >> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>>> >> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>>> >> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>>> >
>>> > Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
>>> > up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
>>> > pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
>>> > etc etc etc.
>>> >
>>> > *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
>>> > degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
>>> > flaunt it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
>>> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video
>>> was annoying as hell.
>>>
>>
>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>
>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?

You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.