On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:39:53 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>>>>
>>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>>>
>>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
>>
>>What brings you to this interesting perspective?
>
>Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
>whatever).
>
>And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
>support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
>ignorant and narrow-minded person.
>
>Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
>to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
>open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
>situation.
>
>It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
>that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
>don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
>thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
>Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
>the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
>about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
>mainstream party.
>
>People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
>DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
>I call that narrow-minded.

Sure but I wasn't so much commenting on that caricature *** guy, but
wondering if sf implied what I thought she implied.

--
Bruce