On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:24:38 -0600, onglet > wrote:

>On 3/30/2016 9:51 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:34:34 AM UTC-6, onglet wrote:
>>> On 3/30/2016 9:15 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>> I went to a state university, lived at home except for one year, and worked throughout
>>>> my entire four years. What's your problem? If college costs are rolled back,
>>>> then the dollar's value in wages and salaries should match the same era. You
>>>> really can't have one without the other, that I can see.
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Logical.
>>>
>>> Kinda puts the kibosh on all of Bernie's "free stuff" though...
>>
>> People will still be able to rack up thousands in debt to go to PRIVATE Universities if they choose to.
>
>Can you imagine....I think it's called...wait for it...FREE WILL!
>
>> Bernie is proposing making PUBLIC colleges tuition free!
>
>TANSTAAFL!
>
>
>http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/03/po...college-costs/
>
>Sanders' free college plan would require states buy in big.
>The Vermont senator hasn't released many details on his proposal.
>However, his campaign pointed to legislation he introduced last year
>that called for the federal government to cover two-thirds of the bill
>for undergraduate students, with the states handling the rest. This
>would cost the feds $47 billion a year, while states would be left with
>a $23 billion tab, he estimated.
>The price tag may turn out to be even bigger, depending on how many more
>students enroll. A tuition-free degree would likely attract many takers.

Takers is right, and they'll never give back.