On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:35:45 -0500, Pan Ohco > wrote:

>On 27 Aug 2004 12:46:07 GMT, Michel Boucher >
>wrote:
>
>>"Mr. Wizard" > wrote in
. com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> I'd like to see
>>>> Bush's fellow National Guardsmen back up his claim to have done
>>>> his full service, but we can't see to *find* any.
>>>>
>>> wrong
>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=14805
>>
>>Some guy they dredged out of the depths after the fact? Hardly a
>>ringing endorsement.
>
>Oh come on Terry, your statement has been blown.
>>
>>So the "witness" explains that even he knows Bush didn't serve his
>>full service:
>
>Oh now you don't believe the writers statement, except for parts of
>it.
>Parts that you think up holds your arguments.

And you apparently don't believe the statements from Swifties who
support Kerry's version of events, only those from Swifties who call
Kerry a liar, nor do you believe official Navy documentation that
supports Kerry's version.

What's that "h" word I'm looking for...?

This whole election has been quite an interesting and intense look
into human nature and _our_ (yes I'm including myself) inability to
see past our own biases and rather than see what _is_ true, see what
we _want_ truth to be.