On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:38:59 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 04/06/2016 4:36 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 3:58 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:10:58 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/06/2016 2:06 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I concur. Cheap and filling, and not at all the way that I eat,
>>>>>> which is
>>>>>> a lot of vegetables, a little meat, and not much carbs. Plus, I
>>>>>> detest
>>>>>> the taste of re-heated meat, unless it's in some strong-flavored sauce
>>>>>> like barbecue sauce.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've heard other people say that before about reheated meat.
>>>>
>>>> I'm with Cindy on this one! Even currying leftover meat can't remove
>>>> that taste.
>>>
>>> Could you describe the taste please?
>>>
>>> Then again... if I know what to look for, I might find it myself :/
>>> I have had reheated meat that wasn't particularly great, but usually
>>> that was because it was too dry.
>>>
>> It's a sort of rancid *** metallic taste. To me, that is! I don't know
>> how Cindy would describe it.
>> Graham
>Note that this only affects reheated roasted, grilled or fried meat, not
>stews.

Yes, makes sense. Presumably reheated lasagna or spag bol would be
okay too. Well, the latter two are actually better when reheated, IMO.