FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Bruce[_28_]

In article >,
says...
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:32:40 +1000, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, says...
> >>
> >> Bruce wrote:
> >> >
> >> > In article >, says...
> >> > >
> >> > > Bruce wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > says...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > "cshenk" wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Don and I decided one of us needed to be home when
> >> > > > > >Charlotte was born and since I was active duty and he had just
> >> > > > > >'retired' and my income potential was higher, he stayed home. It was
> >> > > > > >tough because the stay-at-home women felt threatened somehow to see a
> >> > > > > >man do it with a small child while the wife went to work.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I think you have a high powered imagination - why on earth would they
> >> > > > > feel threatened? More likely your husband felt threatened.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is that you talking or that same old chip on your shoulder?
> >> > >
> >> > > I completely agree with lucretia here. I can't imagine why stay at
> >> > > home women would feel threatened by a "Mr.Mom."
> >> >
> >> > You may not be able to imagine it, but that's the reality cshenk
> >> > described. Imagine harder.
> >>
> >> cshenk is the one that needs to imagine harder. If stay-at-home women
> >> felt threatened that a man would do that, they must worry that their
> >> husbands might want to do the same and THEY might actually have to go
> >> out each day for a workplace job.
> >
> >I can imagine that women felt threatened by a man coming into "their"
> >domain. That's all.
>
> Well you are totally incorrect.

How do you know? You weren't there