On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 07:55:06 -0600, graham > wrote:

> On 22/06/2016 6:30 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:22:59 +0100, Janet > wrote:
> >
> >> In article >,
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:59:18 +0100, Janet > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In article >,
> >>>> says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:16:03 -0600, graham > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 21/06/2016 6:22 AM, Janet wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article >,
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Rhubarb Coffee Cake
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> nice but where's the coffee?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Janet UK
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> That name has always puzzled me too!
> >>>>>> Graham
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Janet & Graham: Where's the tea in your teacake?
> >>>>
> >>>> hiding under the rhubarb
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Ha! My coffee is in a cup next to the plate my coffeecake is on.
> >>
> >> You've been cheated. Here, you'd have coffee in your cup AND in your
> >> coffee cake.
> >>
> >> Just a transpondial difference. There are a couple of very popular cake
> >> recipes here which include the word coffee, with coffee as an
> >> ingredient.
> >> Coffee and walnut cake,
> >
> > That would be TIAD.
> > I've seen hazelnut coffee and almond coffee, but never walnut coffee.
> >
> >> coffee and chocolate cake.
> >
> > That would be MOCHA.
> >
> But Mocha is a variety of coffee bean:-)
> Graham
>
> Here we go:-)

Sounds like you've never had coffee from mocha beans, there's no
flavor difference and no confusion. Mocha is mocha.

--

sf