On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:27:52 -0000 (UTC), Ray Abbitt
> wrote:

>In article >, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
>>
>>Well I use it for free so I suppose its the least I can do. It's a good
>>product.
>>
>>---
>>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>https://www.spam.com/spam
>>
>Not that good. I received 3 emails today with that line that all had
>infected attachments. A really free antivirus software (clamav) on my
>server detected and quarantined them. And clamav doesn't advertise. Even
>when it scans OUTGOING email on my server. It just quietly does its
>job--and does it quite well.


Precisely. I've used Clamwin on this machine for around 5 years now
with no issues whatsoever and no other bullshit to put up with just
because it's free either.

Note the intentionally incorrect sig delimiter that Avast uses, to
circumvent email and news clients automatically removing the sig from
any replies. Now that's a class act... who would trust an AV when they
do that??