On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 18:09:36 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>On 2016-07-01 15:28:12 +0000, sf said:
>
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:00:45 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 00:42:52 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Boris Johnson is not going to be the next PM.
>>>>>
>>>>> ITYS
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, I saw that on the news - but I trust him as much as I trust Trump
>>>> to follow through.
>>>
>>> He's got no choice; he's out of the running, entries closed yesterday.
>>> There are five, Theresa May, Michael Gove, Stephen Crabb, Andrea Leadsom
>>> and Liam Fox.
>>>
>>> The Conservative MP's will choose two of them to be put to a party
>>> vote. Conservative party members will elect one as their new leader/PM.
>>> Probably Theresa May.
>>>
>>>
>> I like how quickly it's done over there. I'm sick of the electoral
>> process and we haven't even formally nominated our party choices yet.
>
>You can certainly cut down on the time and drama by removing the "voice
>of the people" at the beginning and putting it all in the hands of a
>small group of "elites" (and of course the deep-pockets that they
>represent).
It would be easier to have one Primary day with all the candidates on
the ticket to determine the Democratic and Republican choice. and
later have a voting day to determine whether the Republican candidate
or the Democratic candidate was the one to be in the White House. That
way every citizen would actually have the opportunity to vote.
Silly me.
Janet US