In article >, says...
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> T...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >>
> >> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > In article >,
> >> > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam
> >> > > > > and other foods they consider "low class."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to
> >> > > > eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> >> >
> >> > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> >> > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> >> > unless I missed something.
> >>
> >> This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the
> >> few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the
> >> thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> >
> > This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> > Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> > "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> > while we discuss good food?
> >
> >> I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good
> >> and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It
> >> was good eats!
> >
> > Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.
>
> Good eats is a matter of taste, and what is good eats to any given poster on
> any given day is certainly dissed here on just about a daily basis.

Yes, but that's another topic. dsi1 says that you can't call any food
bad because there are people who are hungry. But everybody considers
certain foods bad, even though we'd still eat them if we had no choice.