Thread
:
Hot in the city? No.
View Single Post
#
132
(
permalink
)
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Bruce[_28_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 15,279
Hot in the city? No.
In article >,
says...
>
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 7:22:24 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >,
says...
> > >
> > > Bruce wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article >,
says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/3/2016 3:43 PM, Je?us wrote:
> > > > > > I know it's a big upheaval, but why not move? The way you have
> > > > > > described where you live here makes it sounds like an awful place.
> > > > >
> > > > > Moving is not always an economical option.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have to wonder why they bought the house in the first place. It
> > > > > sounds like she never liked it.
> > > >
> > > > Is there ever a point where people in this newsgroup start minding their
> > > > own business? Remember when they were questioning why you live where you
> > > > live, McBiddy?
> > >
> > > Come on, Bruce. You've been here long enough now.
> > > Everyone minds everyone's business here in RFC.
> > > The conflicts keep the group alive.
> > > Notice all the other foodtalk-only groups are dead.
> >
> > Yes, but having to defend why you live in the house where you live is a
> > bit extreme, even for rfc. Next, people will be putting up pictures of
> > their partner so rfc can decide whether that's the right one for them.
>
> You'd think that Jill, who's had to defend living where she does on
> numerous occasions, would cut Julie some slack. Ah, well, a petty
> consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.
Maybe it's a case where, over time, victims become perps
Reply With Quote
Bruce[_28_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Bruce[_28_]