In article >,
says...
>
> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 5:33:22 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >,
> > says...
> > >
> > > On 2016-08-13 6:24 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> > > > On 8/13/2016 6:17 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > > >> On 2016-08-13 5:37 PM, Roy wrote:
> > > >>> On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 3:26:55 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> > > >>>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> > > >>
> > > >>> But printed on cans it means "GREEN BEANS" you nitwit, no matter how
> > > >>> slender, green, round, tender, crisper or longer they may be. That
> > > >>> applies no matter what variety of green beans they may be.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> p.s. Don't thank Brucie for anything...he's just another spammer
> > > >>> trying to stir up trouble. ====
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I just got back from a short vacation in Quebec. These green beans, no
> > > >> matter how relatively long and thin they were, were all haricots verts.
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, don't they speak French in Quebec?
> > >
> > > Yes, most of them do, and that is why they call green beans haricots verts.
> >
> > French speakers call all green beans haricots verts, because haricot
> > vert means green bean, but when most English speakers use the term, they
> > mean 'a variety of green beans that is longer, thinner, crisper, and
> > more tender than "standard" green beans'.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_bean
> >
> > I imagine that this works slightly differently in Canada, where you have
> > French speaking people and bilingual labelling, so that "haricots
> > verts" can simply mean "green beans", without referring to a specific
> > type, like it does in other English speaking countries.
> ===
> What do you mean by "like it does in other English speaking countries"? You "imagine" all this without seeing an American label or an Australian label.
> ====

Yes, that's my theory. It would explain why you disagree with Wikipedia.
Aren't you from Canada?