On 2016-09-11 9:26 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 19:51:29 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-11 7:32 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> In article >, lid
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:52:34 -0700 (PDT), Roy >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 1:46:04 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> =====
>>>>
>>>> He's a vegetarian who has problems with people eating meat. It's
>>>> animal cruelty, yannow? Except for fish, apparently. Fish are *******s
>>>> and don't deserve to live. It's not cruel to kill and eat fish,
>>>> apparently. Cognitive dissonance at it's very finest.
>>>
>>> That was a bit childish, Jebus. It's alright, though. We all have our
>>> weaker moments.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope. He has pretty well nailed it. I know a number of people who are
>> whatever you want to label people who don't eat four legged meat or
>> chicken but who eat fish and seafood. Chickens, pigs, cows and lambs
>> are killed in a pretty humane manner. Shrimp and fish are dragged up in
>> nets and thrown into the hull of the boat and left to suffocate. I can't
>> imagine how someone can think that sort of death is more humane than
>> having a shot to the head or the head chopped off.
>
> I do note that he had no answer for the double standard I pointed out.
> Piscatorial genocide should be stamped out, man 
>
Of course not. Hence the ad hominem.
I wonder how long it takes a fish to suffocate in a gill net or in the
hull of a boat. The people who think mammals suffer to much don't give a
shit about fish.