On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 12:40:35 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> In article >,
> dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 11:54:50 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:12:13 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:20:27 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi1yahoo.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:53:59 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > > >> Oh, I think I'll write a will instructing my executor to shred my hard
> > > > > >> drive (and my backups) once he's done with it. I have no children or
> > > > > >> siblings, and I've never even met my one and only first cousin..
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >I don't want to get into a discussion about security issues in the modern world. My point was that young people see cloud computing differently than people that grew up with the advent of the age of computers. Old folks see computers as a big boxes, young folks will see it as virtual machines. The cloud is the computer. Obviously a wired network is likely to be more secure than one that broadcasts data through the air. Does that matter a whit? No.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I recently bought an RJ-45 crimper kit to make ethernet cables. It came with the crimper, 100 RJ-45 connectors, and a couple of test boxes to check the cable. It was 12 bucks. What a steal - or was it? Anyway, what this means is that wired networks are going the way of the doodoo.
> > > > >
> > > > > Really? Tell that to the infrastructure of the vast majority of the
> > > > > Internet. Two different technologies, both have advantages and
> > > > > disadvantages. I wired every building on this property with CAT6,
> > > > > something like 900 metres of cable used. Beats the hell out of wifi in
> > > > > a number of ways for my application.
> > > >
> > > > I already know that wired networks are going to be used to connect the
> > > > servers that service the internet. It's faster and more secure.
> > >
> > > Wrong. If you're already wrong at such a basic level, what does that say
> > > about the rest of your theories?
> >
> > Please point out the part that's wrong or are you unable to articulate this? I'd sure like to know what you're trying to say and I'm always open to the facts. I want to be corrected when I'm wrong but you got to give me more than "Wrong."
>
> Wireless isn't faster and it's not more secure either. But there's
> nothing I can say to convince you. Or vice versa. Let's agree to
> disagree.

Try reading more carefully, I did say that wired networks are faster and more secure.

PS: Thanks for wasting my time.