On 30 Aug 2004 23:55:45 GMT, Michel Boucher >
wrote:


>> You are the one that said Bush was not legally elected

> I am not the only one who says it from an analysis of
>the facts in the case and I believe I presented a somewhat more
>cogent view of the thread of events than the simplistic refutations
>one can garner from right and right, that lead me to believe this.

Ah yes Michel Boucher the only clear thinker .

>You have indicated you disagree without providing substantiating
>evidence to back your opinion. I have challenged you to prove me
>wrong (hence using YOUR sources, not mine). Do you get where I'm
>going with this or do I need to be more explicit?

You are going to have to be more explicit.
Why use my source, that you will just say are conservative trash.
I can use your sources that show you are wrong, and then you can't
argue the source. Fully read the latest URL, that you posted.
>
>No, I want you to provide sources for your point of view.

The U.S. constitution.
The Collage of Electors. will elect the President of the U.S.
They did.
George Bush is in the White House.
You may not like it. But we didn't ask you.
>
>We've been through this before and every time you've taken the
>coward's way out and gone silent.

I go silent when your answers are so left field, that they are seen
for what they are. And therefore don't bother responding.
>
>But chew on this: I am open to reviewing that which forms the basis
>of YOUR opinion.

No your not. Time and time again I have given you the basis for my
opinion. And you will name it conservative trash and do not consider
it.


>(wish you were as open to mine, but hey...I'm easy
>going :-) ).

I would be open to yours, but I like some kind of reality in my
thought processes.

> Now's your chance (your last chance) to make a
>Christian gods-fearing pro-Bush anti-commie out of me. Go for it!

I'm not here to convert you Michel. You are unrepentant commie and
will always be so.

Your kidding about that last chance thing aren't you?
Pan Ohco