In article >, Jeßus says...
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:40:54 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, Jeßus says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:26:46 +1100, Bruce >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article >, Jeßus says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article >, Janet B says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> >> >> >> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> >> >> >> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> >> >> >> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> >> >> >> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> >> >> >> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> >> >> >> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> >> >> >> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> >> >> >> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> >> >> >> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> >> >> >> >> started one for yourself.
> >> >> >> >> Janet US
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
> >> >> >> >adversity
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
> >> >> >> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
> >> >> >> people. That's called stirring.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
> >> >> >thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Which is exactly what you just did.
> >> >
> >> >But I don't deny it
> >>
> >> Excellent. I award you a TVP sausage as a reward.
> >
> >Thanks. I had to look that up. It doesn't seem all that bad.
>
> I have horrible memories of them when I went through my vegetarian
> phase at age 18. Trust me, you don't want to try one!

If I want a meat replacer, I prefer mock duck (or mock pork or mock
chicken, same idea). Very nice, but not if you're gluten intolerant.

> >Meat eaters eat it a lot, because it's often used as a meat extender.
>
> I sure don't eat it at all.

No, not unless you eat prefab supermarket meat products to which they
add it as an extender.