Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
POT ROAST
In article >, sf says...
>
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:20:31 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:50:03 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It's patently obvious that you don't know how to cook... I'm postive
> > > > > that for you the acme of fine dining is a drive thru burger joint.
> > > >
> > > > I would gladly rather eat burger joint burgers than watery boiled to
> > > > death beef and vegetables.
> > > >
> > > Gary, I have absolutely no idea what you did to stew - but it sounds
> > > like you murdered it. Therefore, your opinion doesn't count.
> >
> > No ones opinion of a "good" pot roast counts with me. Not even yours. As
> > Bruce said, it's just old ppl food. Bland but filling. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574e0/574e0103512ce12043eb96165930f431775c3e18" alt="Wink"
> >
> > I can do better with whatever cut of meat you use for that.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong either. Pot roast is not nasty or anything to me.
> > It's a bit tasty but it's certainly not something to get excited about
> > when you hear that's what will be for dinner. I'd rather skip dinner
> > and grab a few burgers and fries. heheh
>
> Why bother polluting the thread with a dislike which is based on your
> bad cooking?
Isn't cooking what this group is about? And it's not called
rec.food.good.cooking.
|