Thread: POT ROAST
View Single Post
  #117 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Bruce[_28_] Bruce[_28_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,279
Default POT ROAST

In article >,
Cindy Hamilton says...
>
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 2:38:10 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >, Roy
> > says...
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:56:42 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> > > > In article >, sf says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:06:57 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 1:20:56 PM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> > > > > > > sf wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:50:03 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would gladly rather eat burger joint burgers than watery
> > > > > > > > > boiled to
> > > > > > > > > death beef and vegetables.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gary, I have absolutely no idea what you did to stew - but it sounds
> > > > > > > > like you murdered it. Therefore, your opinion doesn't count.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No ones opinion of a "good" pot roast counts with me. Not even yours. As
> > > > > > > Bruce said, it's just old ppl food. Bland but filling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why the hell do you read a thread labeled POT ROAST ? Just skip it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I think he misses Julie.
> > > >
> > > > I'm reading this thread too and I also don't like pot roast. Does that
> > > > me a bad person make?
> > >
> > > Obviously, you've never eaten a properly prepared "pot roast" or
> > > you'd have a different opinion. Perhaps you need to download a
> > > number of recipes and experiment.
> > > =====

> >
> > Or perhaps I'm just not too keen on pot roasts. Just like I don't demand
> > that y'all love spicey tofu stir fries.

>
> As it happens, I love spicy tofu stir fries. And pot roast.
>
> In fact, I've had tofu much more often in the past couple of years
> than I've had pot roast (which is zero since we've started losing
> weight in a serious fashion).
>
> What I object to, is characterizing pot roast as "old people food".
> "I don't care for pot roast" is fine. "Nursing home food" is an
> insult to pot-roast lovers everywhere.


If we all talk like UN diplomats this place becomes a snooze fest. I'm
sure y'all can occasionally handle slightly provocative wording.
Especially since the snootiest, most precious biddies have already
killfiled me anyway