On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:30:48 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-11-20 9:56 AM, wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:48:42 -0500, Dave Smith
>
>>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bingo. They are mostly compulsive posters who had an excuse to tap out a
>>> few words without having to use their brains. Every once in a while they
>>> try to stir things up but it hasn't worked. There is a certain irony to
>>> their past history of protecting Julie from abuse and then trying to
>>> incite negative comments about her. That is the shameful work of
>>> passive aggressive personalities at play.
>>
>> Don't know how you come up with that Dave, but then you are keeping
>> good company!
>
>
>I didn't think it was that hard to see. We had someone here who had a
>compulsion to post stuff that annoyed a number of people who called her
>on her bullshit, and there was a small group who felt compelled to
>defend her from what they thought was abuse, and they claimed that we
>would attack her even if she wasn't here. That didn't happen. She left
>the group. Since she was no longer posting so people stopped attacking
>her on the content of her posts. He little fan club had no one to
>protect anymore, so nothing much to satisfy their own compulsion to post.
>
>On several occasions these same people have posted about her, which I
>think is a blatant attempt to get people talking about her, basically
>inviting people to make negative comments about her. They aren't going
>to make negative comments about her themselves. Instead, they set bait
>for other people to do that. Perhaps they miss having someone here is
>is more pathetic than themselves.

You are going on at length about her, even though she is no longer
here. I never understood why you, and some others, felt they had to
respond to her every post! Why couldn't you just ignore them? I did
with one exception when she incorrectly blahed on about the Canadian
healthcare system failing her friend in NB. It was all inaccurate and
reflected badly on our health care, so I did correct her on that,
probably not nicely but still. If you would have done that the number
of posts would have dropped dramatically.