On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:46:51 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:39:43 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>True... even though cell phone cameras have come a long way there's no
>>way they can come close to competing with a real digicam... they don't
>>have a viewfinder, there's no flash, and there are many focusing
>>features a cell phone camera hasn't like adjusting for lighting
>>conditions, or tele but mostly they don't have a lens arrangement,
>>they are classified as pinhole cameras. Even an under $100 no frills
>>digicam is leagues ahead of any cell phone camera.
>
>Most of all they don't have a quality lens, which is arguably the main
>difference. I have a decent DSLR, but didn't want to and am glad I
>didn't take it on my trip. Too bulky and heavy. The new phone did a
>reasonable job for the pics.

So you admit to being lazy and worthless... you're too weak to lift a
camera, maybe it weighs eight ounces. However no one has seen even
one picture from your trip... I don't believe you went on any trip,
you stayed home in your hovel, in your hospital bed tended to by a
caretaker who empties your bedpan and wipes your filthy ass, you
atrophied pretender, sucking down Ensure.