On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:39:52 PM UTC-10, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:05:16 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> "dsi1" wrote in message newsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b667a/b667a596c8a59adff3e594220ac8513a3aaf1e4e" alt="Embarrassment"
> >
> >> Your problem is that you use a camera to take pictures. Nobody takes
> >> pictures with a camera anymore. Even a stopid cheese sandwich looks
> >> great when you use a phone!
> >
> >Nobody takes pics with a camera anymore? Really? I doubt that speaks to all
> >the cameraphobes who love their cameras.
> >
> >Cheri
>
> True... even though cell phone cameras have come a long way there's no
> way they can come close to competing with a real digicam... they don't
> have a viewfinder, there's no flash, and there are many focusing
> features a cell phone camera hasn't like adjusting for lighting
> conditions, or tele but mostly they don't have a lens arrangement,
> they are classified as pinhole cameras. Even an under $100 no frills
> digicam is leagues ahead of any cell phone camera.
My son's cell phone camera is able to focus on objects after the photo is taken. Try doing that with your primitive camera. His phone records image data instead of an image.
Here's my dinner. Garlic shrimp with some pepper chips and stinky takuan for good measure. Holy heartburn!
https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...bcMxx2PoOvOaUk