On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:
>In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>
>> On 2016-11-30 1:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> > In article >, Dave Smith says...
>> >>
>> >> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> >>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> >>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> >>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>> >>>
>> >>> I could bully *you*... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574e0/574e0103512ce12043eb96165930f431775c3e18" alt="Wink"
>> >>>
>> >>> Jill
>> >>
>> >> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
>> >> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
>> >> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>> >
>> > Why do you keep bringing her up?
>> >
>>
>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic nymshifters who
>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>
>I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.