In article >, cshenk
says...
>
> What you see is an uneven treatment by some women at men, then not
> recognizing it for what it is. They get OUTRAGED when it is directed at
> women, but fail to see it when directed at men.
>
> Sheldon's service has been dismissed by most. I object to that. As a
> result, you see some of the *women* upset at me because they want me to
> castigate his every word.
>
> That is their problem. They want me to ignore his service when it
> comes into question instead of recognizing it and the time period being
> 50 years or so ago.
>
> I don't approve of much Sheldon says, but i largely ignore him or if
> replying, trim the stupid parts.

> > In article >, U.S. Janet
> > B. says...

> > > You have
> > > been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will
> > > not engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other
> > > topic.

> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce
> > >> >> wrote:

> > Snooty drama queen.
>
> (grin) Fact is for *some* of the women here, if I don't follow them
> like a lemming, they go on attack and always have. I suspect some are
> upset that I don't act very lemming-like.

I think that the U.S. Janet B. (sounds like the name of a battleship)
has her nose so high in the air that she can't read all Usenet messages
properly. So sometimes the poor thing comes out with whoppers. Even
during Christmas!