On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:42:48 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:05:02 +1100, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:29:19 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:39:59 +1100, Bruce >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:36:45 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:30:31 +1100, Bruce >
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>There you go. You say they lived long because they had hard lives.
>>>>>>Lucretia thinks it's because of the fat (that they actually ate little
>>>>>>off in those days). I'm guessing it's because of low fat and sweet
>>>>>>potato. We can all have our own party thanks to these people.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. The Inuit are well known for scoffing down tons of sweet potato.
>>>>
>>>>The Inuit may do other things that make them live long (do they live
>>>>long?)
>>>
>>>Well, they were known for low levels of diabetes, heart disease and
>>>cancer. Their diet was mostly high in protein and fats and low in
>>>fruits and vegetables. Good fats, as opposed to bad fats, I should
>>>add.
>>
>>So you think they had a low life expectancy because of the prevalence
>>of polar bear death?
>
>Yes. That and space aliens. Where did I mention polar bears?
It was a question
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
You suggest a link between their high good fat
diet and their good health, yet they died young. Why was that?