On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 8:50:48 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/7/2017 7:53 PM, Bruce wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:20:56 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 9:50:33 AM UTC-5, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree with you, Cindy. The price must depend upon where you are.
> >>> And the name of the place where you eat (name brand will hit you in
> >>> the pocket) And the size of meat that you demand. A 6 ounce piece of
> >>> steak is plenty for me and an 8 ounce would be where I wouldn't have
> >>> any sides with the meat .
> >>> Janet US
> >>
> >> Last night I grilled skinless, boneless chicken breast. While I plated
> >> as much as I wanted to eat, I decided to weigh it. 2 ounces.
> >
> > Am I correct when I say that 56 grams (2 ounces) of meat or fish is
> > extremely little and 168 grams (6 ounces) is average or a bit under?
> >
>
> Sounds about right. I'm content with 6 ounces. Most dietary guidelines
> are in the 4 to 6 ounce range. If you don't want a bug meal, 2 oz.
> would be OK.

Yes, 2 ounces is not very much. I find I do much better overall when I
eat a small amount of meat and lots of vegetables.

Over the course of the day, I get my 46 grams of protein. Why are
so many people hung up on serving size?

Cindy Hamilton