On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:22:19 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 8:50:48 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 2/7/2017 7:53 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:20:56 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 9:50:33 AM UTC-5, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I agree with you, Cindy. The price must depend upon where you are.
>> >>> And the name of the place where you eat (name brand will hit you in
>> >>> the pocket) And the size of meat that you demand. A 6 ounce piece of
>> >>> steak is plenty for me and an 8 ounce would be where I wouldn't have
>> >>> any sides with the meat .
>> >>> Janet US
>> >>
>> >> Last night I grilled skinless, boneless chicken breast. While I plated
>> >> as much as I wanted to eat, I decided to weigh it. 2 ounces.
>> >
>> > Am I correct when I say that 56 grams (2 ounces) of meat or fish is
>> > extremely little and 168 grams (6 ounces) is average or a bit under?
>> >
>>
>> Sounds about right. I'm content with 6 ounces. Most dietary guidelines
>> are in the 4 to 6 ounce range. If you don't want a bug meal, 2 oz.
>> would be OK.
>
>Yes, 2 ounces is not very much. I find I do much better overall when I
>eat a small amount of meat and lots of vegetables.
>
>Over the course of the day, I get my 46 grams of protein. Why are
>so many people hung up on serving size?
>
>Cindy Hamilton

Well sometimes the serving size can make a big difference on calorie
content. I don't worry about that but I don't want, for instance, a
huge steak arriving in front of me. That tends to overwhelm me having
been brought up to eat everything on my plate.