On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:31:08 -0600, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote:
>snip
>>>
>>>
>>> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high.
>>>
>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime...
>>
>>Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed
>>mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine.
>>
>>Cindy Hamilton
>
>I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover
>what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou,
>sainted Pharisees.

"Don't have children if you can't look after them" sounds very
reasonable to me.