View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Dave Smith[_1_] Dave Smith[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,884
Default Spring weather (sigh)

On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!"
> > wrote:


>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime...

>
> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old
> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you?


You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have
leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society
who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare
queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop
out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It
is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay
to support those others.