On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:56:10 -0300, wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:00:21 +1000, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 20:56:35 -0300, wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:50:10 +1000, Bruce >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:21:18 -0300, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Again, with the Fentanyl problem, spending bucks on distributing the
>>>>>antidote freely seems a better bargain.
>>>>
>>>>I don't know what that is. A pain killer, I guess.
>>>
>>>I think it was a legal drug originally but it is now made illegally.
>>>As it is so strong it comes in from China in an envelope and is then
>>>made into pills. The problem arises because when you take one you
>>>have no way of knowing how much fentanyl it contains. If your luck
>>>failed it contains too much and you will die. There is an anti dote
>>>which can be given with good results, given the person is found in
>>>time. It boggles my mind that people take it given it's really like
>>>Russian Roulette, but I suppose when you are totally addicted...
>>
>>Maybe this drug hasn't made it to the Australian countryside yet.
>>Sounds bad.
>
>You'll know when and if it does.
>
>https://www.statnews.com/2016/04/05/...aced-to-china/

My hope's on Australian sniffer dogs.