"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
9.44...

On Sun 28 May 2017 11:15:52a, Ophelia told us...

> "Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
> 9.44...
>
> On Sat 27 May 2017 11:02:25a, cshenk told us...
>
>> lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:29:09 -0500, "cshenk" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 17:39:38 -0500, "cshenk"
>>> >> > wrote: >>
>>> >> > Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT),
>>> >> >> " >> >
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject
>>> >> >> >> unchanged. >> > >
>>> >> >> > >
>>> >> >> > Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the
>>> >> >> > wording of the subject. At least you didn't see
>>> >> >> > everybody else's replies along with the original post
>>> >> >> > when I replied.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post
>>> >> >> and
>>> >> nobody >> seems to mind those. RFC: double standards,
>>> >> hypocrisy and group >> hysteria. Great fun!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > No, it's not the same at all. Sheldon likes big boobs. The
>>> >> > N-word >> > is radically past that.
>>> >>
>>> >> His use of other words are just as offensive to women, you
>>> >> just choose >> not to see it for some reason.
>>> >
>>> > Oh here we go again. I'm supposed to fly my hands in the air
>>> > and flap them everytime he says 'boob' or whatever else your
>>> > soul thinks I'm supposed to control that he posts. Guess
>>> > what.
>>> > Not happening. I also dont mindlessly quote those messages
>>> > either.
>>> >
>>> > I may quote a part of his messages if there was something of
>>> > interest, but I remove the rest if it was not of interest.
>>>
>>> boobs? If he stuck with that it would be fine. I suppose you
>>> will claim you have never seen him use filthy language, the sort
>>> that can only be referring to women.
>>
>> And again, you seem to think because I am female, that it's my
>> responsibility to control a usenet member. I tell you what. Try
>> telling the guys here that it's THEIR problem to solve instead of
>> telling me it's all mine because I am female. I bet you get
>> short shrift if you get anything at all.
>>
>> In the end, if you have a problem with any member, take it up
>> with them. Do not expect proxy services and don't blame folks
>> when they refuse to give them.
>>
>
> Why not just drop it, Carol. I know you're on a roll, but it has
> become tiresome and you'll ultimately never accomplish anything by
> pursuing it. What's more, you're just inviting more unnecessary
> commentary.
>
>
> Wayne Boatwright
>
> ===
>
> I am realising she likes the attention)
>
>

She no longer exists in my world.

Wayne Boatwright

====

Nor in mine but you will see responses. Of course if you were Dave you
would whinge about that (although I doubt he is clever enough to know how to
do that). Hell he has had years to learn it but apparently hasn't managed
it.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk