On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:19:13 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:30:04 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>
>>In article >,
says...
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:59:03 +0800, JBurns >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On 27 Jun 2017 01:25:56 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On 2017-06-26, Janet > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I'd be very surprised if any insurer would pay up on goods stolen
>>> >>> from an unlocked car. They certainly wouldn't here.
>>> >>
>>> >>Be surprised!
>>> >>
>>> >>I got my toolbox stolen outta my car. Insurance paid off and never
>>> >>questioned whether the doors were locked or not. Almost $800USD.
>>> >>
>>> >>OTOH, hadda list everything and its worth from my toolbox. Only
>>> >>Snap-On and Mac Tools had a catalog that listed everything I'd lost.
>>> >>
>>> >>This was in the 80s.
>>> >>
>>> >>nb
>>> >
>>> >Here it is an offence to leave an unattended vehicle unlocked.
>>> >Insurance will not pay if the vehicle was not secure, not sure how
>>> >they would know if the whole vehicle was stolen, especially if it is
>>> >not recovered.
>>>
>>> Oops, I hope it's allowed on our own property.
>>
>> Surprising how many people pay through the nose for all kinds of
>>insurance but have no idea what's covered (or not!) because they never
>>read the policy terms and conditions.
>
>My car isn't insured against theft. And even if it was, it's 33 years
>old. I wouldn't get much.
>
>But each to their own, so enjoy!
>
>---
>
>
>We are both running old cars too. Japanese imports. Not a spec of rust.
>
>Both Mitsubishi Pajeros 2.8. I suppose they could be stolen for parts.

Or for a joyride?