wrote in message ...

On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:26:43 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>wrote in message ...
>
>On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:23:49 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>
>>In article >,
says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:48:20 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>
>>> >Well, you keep blaming me because he apparetly called you a c^T at some
>>> >point that I never saw and because I didnt react to a message I never
>>> >saw, you told everyone i must have approved at it as 'his buddy' (your
>>> >words). You cant have it both ways. You either want me to be your
>>> >Mommie to protect you against the big bad Shelton, or you are capable
>>> >on your own in which case you can stp asking me to 'fix it for you'.
>>> >
>>> >Your call.
>>>
>>> I think perhaps you are a drinker like him, the above post is wild and
>>> barely comprehensible.
>>
>> A number of her posts have been very garbled lately but she's
>>oblivious to it. Something's not right.
>>
>> Janet UK
>
>She spelled my name incorrectly and and omited the 'o' from stop,
>otherwise there is nothing garbled or incomprehensible, it's perfectly
>clear English... methinks it's yoose two who imbibe too much to see
>clearly... lay off the hallucinogens so yoose can focus.... me thinks
>yoose are high on hate.
>
>==
>
>Huh nothing new there. She has been high on hate for decades!
>
>It is all that keeps her going, especially when she thinks she can get at
>me!
>
>Yep SHE has been following me around for *decades* to try and run me off
>the
>net.
>
>Not worked yet I guess HE just isn't trying hard enough LOL

No HE/SHE can run you off unless you let them... learn to IGNORE!

==

Of course. Fatty squertz got out of my bin by pretending to be someone else
or I wouldn't have seen it.

I won't fall for that one again.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk