On Sun, 02 Jul 2017 06:04:54 +1000, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 10:19:10 -0300, lucretia
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 22:22:36 +1000, Bruce >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>You said sending children to sports clubs was very expensive. I said
>>>that, when I was a child, I didn't need a sports club. I just played
>>>football on the street. You said my age was showing, because these
>>>days it's way too dangerous for children to play on the street. They
>>>always have to be under supervision.
>>>
>>>It went something like that.
>>
>>I know you cannot produce that post because it goes against everything
>>I believe. Yes, I would have said sports for kids are very expensive
>>these days, David introduced soccer for kids here in 1968 when we were
>>horrified that locally the sports group wanted to raise $3,000 to put
>>together a baseball team. David said 'send me your kids, I'll bring
>>a ball and I will send you home tired kids' - they played shirts and
>>skins and within two years over a thousand kids were playing.
>>
>>Sadly I was recently horrified to see how expensive soccer for kids
>>is, not the original, inclusive idea.
>
>I'll see if I can find it later. There are no unique keywords to
>search for, which makes it hard. I already tried.
>
>By the way, it's not that I want to dig up that discussion. I'm just
>trying to make clear that I wasn't lying.

Knowing very well how I feel, I know I would never have said anything
of the sort. I am willing to bet if you can find it that it was
someone else in a thread, just goes completely against everything I
believe in very strongly on the raising of kids.