On 7/1/2017 11:46 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 4:42:16 PM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2017 9:34 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't quote anything. Google Groups automatically does the quoting but hides the quotes from the user. I don't know why all the newsreaders don't do that. It's a very clean and clear interface. I'll trim the posts but only as a courtesy - it's not really going to do a thing for me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But it does a lot for the rest of us. That is one reason I'd not use GG.
>>
>> The real reason you don't use Google Groups is that a long time ago, yoose guys got conned into believing that GG was going to ruin Usenet and the rest is history. Bad, sad, history. Yoose guys don't even have a rational reason for your behavior. Your above paragraph doesn't make any sense. I use GG because it does a lot for me. I can post and read faster and the topics are more clearly laid out than on my Thunderbird reader. These days I hate opening up Thunderbird - it's too slow and messy. I can also access my subscribed groups on any computer I'm at. Your rationale is that I should drive a Model T because it would sure help you guys driving Model Ts out. I ain't buying it.
>
>
> I'd use it if it worked as well as Agent or Thunderbird. Just the fact it makes quoting and trimming difficult puts it into the second class category. But you can go ahead and think you are superior.
>
> This is from Google Groups.
>

Notice it did not properly distinguish what you wrote from what I wrote.

This is from Thunderbird.