lucretiaborgia wrote:
>Gary wrote:
>>Gary wrote:
>>>jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd really rather not see the "hot girls" advertisements at the end of
>>>> that link. I thought postimage.org was better than that.
>>>
>>> I see the "hot girls" ads on page too.
>>> Assuming that people are posting the .jpg link, seems that
>>> postimage is redirecting to a whole page and showing all the
>>> advertisements - just like tinypic does.
>>>
>>> Jebus is the one that told us all about alt pic hosting pages.
>>> He mentioned postimage.org
>>> But he also included hostpic.org
>>>
>>> That's the better one imo.
>>>
>>> Click on this and see if it's better or not.
>>> It works well on my old computer but I'll have to
>>> look at it on my newer laptop to see if it also
>>> redirects to an html page or just shows the plain pic.
>>>
>>> Jackie was my home finance person.
>>> She hid my cash behind the sofa. Safe enough.
>>> http://www.hostpic.org/images/1708021428080101.jpg
>>
>>OK, I just clicked on that on the new computer. No web page with ads, no
>>crap, just the pic downloaded immediately.
>>
>>Might I suggest everyone switch to hostpic.org for downloading pics?
>>It works for me.
>>
>I'm staying with postimage - only you and Jill saw any girls.

So far I've been using postimage as you suggested and so far I've seen
no girls, but I'll keep my eyes peeled.