On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:48:51 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:42:18 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:56:25 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote: >>
>> >> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:26:24 -0600, graham >
>> >> wrote: >>
>> >> >> > On 2017-08-24 3:18 PM, Carol Shenkenberger wrote:
>> >> >> >> http://www.ozini.com/wp-content/uplo.../08/fagbug.jpg
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> LOL!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > What a despicable person you are!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +50!
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you Lucretia, but it's obviously fake.
>> >> >
>> >> > There are only 2 people here who have serious issues and were on
>> a >> > diatribe today. You and Bruce. Reverse engineering cshenk to
>> my >> > name isnt that hard as I've been posing recipes for years that
>> >> > makes it easy.
>> >>
>> >> Huh, what have I got to do with this? Or Lucretia for that matter?
>> >> Your mind works in very strange ways.
>> >
>> > Creative cropping on your end makes it look like I said other than I
>> > did.
>> >
>> > "Thank you Lucretia, but it's obviously fake.
>> >
>> > There are only 2 people here who have serious issues and were on a
>> > diatribe today. You and Bruce. Reverse engineering cshenk to my
>> > name isnt that hard as I've been posing recipes for years that
>> > makes it easy.
>> >
>> > I don't know who did this, but that it's an obvious fake is easy for
>> > any to see if they look at messages. Some little person is rubbing
>> > their pud and hoping others fall for it, that is all.
>> >
>> > *yawn*"
>> >
>> > I didnt say either of you had anything to do with it, only that the
>> > 2 of you were the only ones on a diatribe (with me).
>>
>> I didn't "crop" anything, not a word. Where do you get all your
>> delusional ideas? Are you on something?
>
>You DID crop the firsr version. Oddly it was where I gave an out of it
>as related.

What did I crop then? And what does "Oddly it was where I gave an out
of it as related" mean?

>Why did you remove that in your reply? Odd but ok if you chose to do
>so.

I didn't remove anything. I just added my reply.